Imran Khan Appeals Drug Conviction on 30 Grounds
Imran Khan, also known as 'King Khan', appeared before the High Court in Suva to challenge his conviction and sentence for drug possession. Represented by lawyer Shayal Kant of Crown Law, Khan's appeal raises 30 grounds, questioning the fairness of the trial process, the handling of evidence, and the severity of the sentence imposed.
Background of the Case
On June 30, 2026, Magistrate Yogesh Prasad sentenced Khan after he was found in possession of 4.1364 grams of methamphetamine. The drugs were concealed in a modified water bottle inside his vehicle in 2023.
Key Issues in the Appeal
- Vehicle Ownership Dispute: The defence argues that the prosecution failed to produce critical documentary evidence, such as Land Transport Authority records, to establish Khan's ownership or exclusive control of the vehicle where the drugs were found.
- New Evidence Rejection: After the judgment, the defence sought to reopen the case based on new and material evidence. The application was refused by the Magistrate, which the defence contends resulted in a denial of procedural fairness and a miscarriage of justice.
- Severity of Sentence: The appeal also contends that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the circumstances of the case.
Next Steps
The case has been adjourned to September 28 to check on the availability of court transcripts and to consider Khan's bail pending appeal. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for how evidence and new information are handled in Fiji's judicial system.