Constitutional Court Declares Dismissal of Parliament President Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of S03o Tomee and Preedncipe has declared the dismissal of the President of the National Assembly, Celmira Sacramento, as unconstitutional, citing violations of the Constitution in the process leading to her removal.

Background

On April 1, 2026, the Constitutional Court of S03o Tomee and Preedncipe issued a ruling declaring the dismissal of Celmira Sacramento, the President of the National Assembly, as unconstitutional. This decision comes in response to a controversial session held by a majority of deputies that led to her removal.

Details of the Ruling

The court found that the session convened to dismiss Sacramento was organized without adherence to constitutional procedures. Specifically, the session was called by a group of deputies without the involvement of the President of the Assembly, which the court determined violated the Constitution. The ruling emphasized that such actions undermine the principles of democratic governance and the rule of law.

Statements from the Court

In its decision, the court stated, "The Constitutional Court declares the organic and functional unconstitutionality of the convocation of plenary sessions of the National Assembly promoted by a group of deputies without the involvement of the President of the National Assembly, for violation [...] of the Constitution of the Republic." The court further declared all decisions made during the contested session as null and void.

Implications for Governance

This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to constitutional procedures in legislative processes. It serves as a reminder that all actions taken by governmental bodies must comply with established legal frameworks to maintain the integrity of democratic institutions.

Conclusion

The Constitutional Court's decision to declare the dismissal of the President of the National Assembly as unconstitutional reinforces the necessity for all branches of government to operate within the confines of the Constitution. This ruling highlights the judiciary's role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that democratic principles are respected in S03o Tomee and Preedncipe.