JusticeFace Pro
JusticeFace Pro
Sep 09, 2026
Fiji

FCOSS Warns of Potential Misuse of Proposed Police Surveillance Powers

The Fiji Council of Social Services (FCOSS) has raised concerns over the proposed Fiji Police Bill 2026, cautioning that the new surveillance, tracking, and biometric powers could be misused against civil society groups, political opponents, and journalists. FCOSS Programme Manager Josaia Tokoni highlighted Fiji's history of coups and political interference, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards to prevent potential abuses.

Key Concerns Raised by FCOSS

  • Self-Investigation by Police: The bill allows police to investigate complaints against their own officers, which FCOSS argues could lead to biased outcomes. Tokoni pointed to clauses 57 and 62, noting that the force investigating itself poses significant risks.
  • Offence of Causing 'Disaffection': The bill introduces an offence for causing "disaffection" among police staff. FCOSS warns that this could criminalize legitimate criticism from unions, journalists, or advocacy groups, potentially stifling free speech and accountability.
  • Authority to Sign Search Warrants: FCOSS recommends removing Justices of the Peace as authorities to sign search warrants, suggesting that warrants could be signed and sent electronically to ensure impartiality and prevent misuse.

Government's Response

Assistant Minister Ratu Josaia Niudamu questioned the feasibility of removing Justices of the Peace from the warrant process, especially in remote areas lacking magistrates. He inquired about alternative solutions for regions like Lakeba, Navosa, and Vunidawa. Tokoni proposed the use of electronic signatures to address this concern.

Positive Aspects Acknowledged

Despite the concerns, FCOSS welcomed certain provisions in the bill, such as the new use-of-force standards and the establishment of an independent disciplinary tribunal, viewing them as steps toward greater accountability within the police force.

The parliamentary committee is expected to consider these submissions as it reviews the proposed legislation, balancing the need for effective law enforcement with the protection of civil liberties.